Skip to main content

Practical Sense

TITLE OF THE ARTICLE

By Name of the author

Current statut of the author

Issue n°x : Issue title

TITLE OF THE ARTICLE

By Name of the author

Current statut of the author

Issue n°x : Issue title

 

Finally, as regards transclasses, as the term appears in the title of Chantal Jaquet’s book, we can here examine its English translation. Les transclasses ou la non-reproduction was translated by Gregory Elliott as Transclasses. A Theory of Social Non-Reproduction (2023). The emphasis here was placed on the theoretical dimension of the work and of the concept. The book’s description on the publisher’s website, paradoxically, reads “how people become class traitors.” The phrase thus invokes the central concept against which transclasse was originally coined. The theoretical value emphasized by the English translation seems to have generated a feedback effect on the philosopher’s work, having recently published the essay Révolutions transclasses. Une nouvelle théorie de l’émancipation [Transclass revolutions: a new theory of emancipation] (2026) in French. The demarcation of the uses of the French terms transfuges, transfuges de classe, transclasses, and their translations into English reveals two principal elements.


First, all these words, now often used interchangeably, were coined in different contexts and have different values from a sociological perspective. Transfuge has never been the subject of a precise sociological conceptualization. It’s certainly transfuge de classe which (paradoxically as the expression circulated[ from literature towards sociology) has been the subject of the most controlled sociological uses, at the same moment when prophecies heralding the end of antagonistic relations between social groups were circulating within the discipline. As for transclasses1test , coined in reaction to transfuge de classe, until today it has principally been used in the media without having been applied to empirical research.


Secondly, each of these expressions has been primarily coined within a national, or even a Parisian, context. Initial outlines of an inquiry into their translation into English reveals that this process is very recent and still unfixed, as demonstrated by the continued use of quotation marks and variations between the English terms “class defector” and “class traitor,” not to mention transfuge de classe which sometimes remains in French. 
This attentive, preliminary study of these terms relative to social mobility and the narratives [efn_note]test[/efn_note] accompanying it will, hopefully, contribute to further sociological reflections on our collective uses of words and concepts.

 

 

English translations of these concepts: several landmarks

Transfuges, transfuges de classe, and transclasses, which thus attest to three very different histories, were nevertheless all coined within the context of French literature and philosophy. Having quickly delineated the contexts of their production and circulation in French, we can now examine the circulation of these terms in English via their translation to see if any sociologically pertinent constants emerge. Insofar as the term transfuge2 test plus long belongs to everyday language, it is impossible to satisfactorily trace its successive uses across time. If we consider the occurrence found in Distinction, we see that Richard Nice’s translation (1984) is meaningful, as transfuge becomes “solitary renegade.” We see that the semantic field of betrayal is thus accentuated, the adjective “solitary” fortifying this negative connotation. Around the same  time that Annie Ernaux’s La Place [A Man’s Place] was published, in a context of the disappearance of the language of social class in favor of representing a society without divisions, Richard Nice responded to the demand for lexicon linking social groups and conflict .


The procedure seems to be the same for Annie Ernaux, who thus imported at the same moment the language of class into literature with the expression transfuge de classe. As she herself explains, if sociology gives her the language and the means to conceptualize her literary  project, it cannot replace it. Sociological concepts are seldom used in Ernaux’s literary writings. Rather, they appear in the discourses that accompany them, such as interviews with researchers and journalists, or in commentaries. It therefore seems unnecessary to examine the English translations of her books, beginning in the 1980s, to concretize the dissemination of the expression in English. One can however hypothesize that Alison L. Strayer’s translation of Ernaux’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech (2023) and the rendering of the phrase transfuge de classe as “class defector” contributed to a renewal of the process of translating the expression into English (Hugueny-Léger, 2025). Another research hypothesis: it’s useful to include English translations of successful narratives that extended the literary approach initiated by Annie Ernaux, such as Didier Eribon’s Retour à Reims [Returning to Reims] (2013) and Édouard Louis’ En finir avec Eddy Bellegueule [The End of Eddy] (2017) – both translated by Michael Lucey – to understand the dissemination of the expression in the anglophone world. One should note that works by these three authors have been adapted for the stage and screen (Edy, 2025), having perhaps played an important role in the circulation of the expression transfuge de classe in the anglophone world.

  

 

Finally, as regards transclasses, as the term appears in the title of Chantal Jaquet’s book, we can here examine its English translation. Les transclasses ou la non-reproduction was translated by Gregory Elliott as Transclasses. A Theory of Social Non-Reproduction (2023). The emphasis here was placed on the theoretical dimension of the work and of the concept. The book’s description on the publisher’s website, paradoxically, reads “how people become class traitors.” The phrase thus invokes the central concept against which transclasse was originally coined. The theoretical value emphasized by the English translation seems to have generated a feedback effect on the philosopher’s work, having recently published the essay Révolutions transclasses. Une nouvelle théorie de l’émancipation [Transclass revolutions: a new theory of emancipation] (2026) in French. The demarcation of the uses of the French terms transfuges, transfuges de classe, transclasses, and their translations into English reveals two principal elements.


First, all these words, now often used interchangeably, were coined in different contexts and have different values from a sociological perspective. Transfuge has never been the subject of a precise sociological conceptualization. It’s certainly transfuge de classe which (paradoxically as the expression circulated from literature towards sociology) has been the subject of the most controlled sociological uses, at the same moment when prophecies heralding the end of antagonistic relations between social groups were circulating within the discipline. As for transclasses, coined in reaction to transfuge de classe, until today it has principally been used in the media without having been applied to empirical research.


Secondly, each of these expressions has been primarily coined within a national, or even a Parisian, context. Initial outlines of an inquiry into their translation into English reveals that this process is very recent and still unfixed, as demonstrated by the continued use of quotation marks and variations between the English terms “class defector” and “class traitor,” not to mention transfuge de classe which sometimes remains in French. 
This attentive, preliminary study of these terms relative to social mobility and the narratives accompanying it will, hopefully, contribute to further sociological reflections on our collective uses of words and concepts.

 

References
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction. A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press. Translated by Richard Nice.

  • Bras, G. et Jaquet, C. (2018) La fabrique des transclasses. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

  • Edy, D. (2025) “Récits de transfuges de classe sur la scène internationale. Le défi de l’actualisation théâtrale”, COnTEXTES [Online], 36.

  • Eribon, D. (2013) Returning to Reims. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e). Translated by Michael Lucey.

  • Ernaux, A. (1983) La Place. Paris: Gallimard.

  • Ernaux, A. (2023) I Will Write to Avenge My People. The Nobel Lecture (2023). Fitzcarraldo/Seven Stories Press. London/New York. Translated by Alison L. Strayer.

  • Hugueny-Léger, É. (2025) “Annie Ernaux à l’international. Résonances et réceptions d’une œuvre ‘universelle’”, COnTEXTES [Online], 36.

  • Jaquet, C. (2014) Les transclasses ou la non-reproduction. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

  • Jaquet, C. (2023) Transclasses. A Theory of Social Non-Reproduction. London/New York: Verso. Translated by Gregory Elliott.

  • Jaquet, C. (2026) Révolutions transclasses. Une nouvelle théorie de l’émancipation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

  • Louis, E. (2017) The End of Eddy. London: Harvill Secker. Translated by Michael Lucey.

  • Fringant, M. (2026) “Des transfuges de classe au transclasse. Réflexions sociologiques à partir des usages sociaux d’une création lexicale”, Zilsel, 16, pp. 303-325.

  • Nizan, P. (1960 [1931]) Aden Arabie. Paris : Maspero.

  • Véron, L. and Abiven, K. (2024) Trahir et venger. Paradoxes des récits de transfuges de classe. Paris: La Découverte.

  • Véron, L. and Abiven, K. (2025) “Du transfuge de classe au class defector : définition, histoire et circulation d’un motif narratif contemporain”, COnTEXTES [Online], 36.